|
You will be given
a group mark for the portfolio concerning task B2 and G. You will get an individual mark for tasks
C, D, E, F (and G). The portfolio will be marked for content, presentation and quality
of English (spelling, grammar, correctness). Furthermore, the way in
which you have contributed to the discussions (task B) will be taken
into account.
The
final mark for this web quest will be the sum of these two marks (1
individual mark and 1 group mark), divided by the factor 2.
The
following scoring rubric can be used by both teacher and student for
judging the final result.
|
Beginning
1 |
Developing
2 |
Accomplished
3 |
Exemplary
4 |
Score |
Collaboration
|
Displayed minimum effort in cooperating with other group
members. |
Performed adequately and contributed to the group. |
Performed and worked with the group in an above average way. |
Performed and worked with other group members in an exceptional
manner. |
|
Presentation |
Lacks sequence. No visuals. Poor delivery. |
Poor sequence. Visuals rarely support text. Too quiet. Incorrect
pronunciation. |
Logical sequence. Visuals related to text and presentation.
Clear voice. Most words correctly pronounced. |
Presents information in logical, interesting sequence. Visuals
reinforced text and presentation. Clear voice and correct
pronunciation. |
|
Accuracy in Discussion and answering questions
|
Doesn't understand content. Cannot answer rudimentary
questions. |
Uncomfortable with content. Cannot answer questions. |
At ease with content. Answers most questions. |
Demonstrates full knowledge of the content. Answers all
questions. |
|
Portfolio
|
Evidence is not related to argument. Total lack of structure
and effort |
Argument is supported by limited evidence. Structure is poorly
developed. |
Position is clearly stated. References are missing. Not enough
evidence. Lacks clear structure. |
Clear references to the issue are stated. Evidence supports the
position. |
|
|